banks Archives - Pat Carroll PCCO - Chartered Accountants & Tax Advisors

EBA calls for European states to shield their banks

European countries need to join forces to shield their banks from the coronavirus outbreak, one of the bloc’s top regulators said today, potentially using a 500 billion euro EU recovery fund to do so.

The remarks from Jose Manuel Campa, who leads the European Banking Authority (EBA), will rekindle a divisive debate about whether rich countries such as Germany should support banks of poorer neighbours such as Italy.

Campa made his comments days after German Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President Emmanuel Macron proposed an EU recovery fund to help the bloc’s worst-hit members to rebuild their economies after the coronavirus outbreak.

“It would make sense to have a European approach to support banks,” Campa told Reuters.

“That could be in the form of a TARP-style precautionary recapitalisation. Here, the EU recovery fund could play a role,” he said, suggesting that assistance could be aimed at banks that were fundamentally robust but hit by the coronavirus crisis.

During the financial crisis of 2008, the U.S. government’s Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) injected billions into the country’s banks.

The EBA says that European banks have built a capital buffer of more than €430 billion, which should be more than enough to cover losses resulting from a rise in unpaid loans as businesses such as travel agents and restaurants struggle to ride out the pandemic.

However, some lenders – particularly in economies where the pandemic hit hardest, such as Italy and Spain – are more vulnerable than others.

Berlin recently dropped its long-standing opposition to joint borrowing by EU countries, backing a €500 billion recovery fund to give grants to countries stricken by the outbreak.

Extending that to banks, however, is likely to stir up stiff opposition.

“I’m expecting a wave of NPLs (non-performing loans) in the next two or three quarters,” said Campa, referring to unpaid loans. “How much is difficult to say.”

Campa was a junior economy minister in Spain at the beginning of the global financial crisis that later prompted Madrid to apply for an international bailout.

To repair its financial system, Spain set up a so-called bad bank to deal with toxic loans.

“The use of bad banks to segregate non-performing loans has proven useful,” Campa said. “Germany had bad banks, while countries like Ireland used asset-management agencies in the same way. It could be used again.”

Germany, where unemployment is low and borrowers are less likely to default, has vehemently opposed any pan-European move, arguing that it would leave Germany on the hook for the problems of lenders in countries with mounting unpaid debts.

“Banks are resilient and stronger than before the last crisis,” said Campa. “But we don’t know how the crisis will evolve. It is best to act sooner rather than later.”

Article Source: Click Here

EBA calls for European states to shield their banks

European countries need to join forces to shield their banks from the coronavirus outbreak, one of the bloc’s top regulators said today, potentially using a 500 billion euro EU recovery fund to do so.

The remarks from Jose Manuel Campa, who leads the European Banking Authority (EBA), will rekindle a divisive debate about whether rich countries such as Germany should support banks of poorer neighbours such as Italy.

Campa made his comments days after German Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President Emmanuel Macron proposed an EU recovery fund to help the bloc’s worst-hit members to rebuild their economies after the coronavirus outbreak.

“It would make sense to have a European approach to support banks,” Campa told Reuters.

“That could be in the form of a TARP-style precautionary recapitalisation. Here, the EU recovery fund could play a role,” he said, suggesting that assistance could be aimed at banks that were fundamentally robust but hit by the coronavirus crisis.

During the financial crisis of 2008, the U.S. government’s Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) injected billions into the country’s banks.

The EBA says that European banks have built a capital buffer of more than €430 billion, which should be more than enough to cover losses resulting from a rise in unpaid loans as businesses such as travel agents and restaurants struggle to ride out the pandemic.

However, some lenders – particularly in economies where the pandemic hit hardest, such as Italy and Spain – are more vulnerable than others.

Berlin recently dropped its long-standing opposition to joint borrowing by EU countries, backing a €500 billion recovery fund to give grants to countries stricken by the outbreak.

Extending that to banks, however, is likely to stir up stiff opposition.

“I’m expecting a wave of NPLs (non-performing loans) in the next two or three quarters,” said Campa, referring to unpaid loans. “How much is difficult to say.”

Campa was a junior economy minister in Spain at the beginning of the global financial crisis that later prompted Madrid to apply for an international bailout.

To repair its financial system, Spain set up a so-called bad bank to deal with toxic loans.

“The use of bad banks to segregate non-performing loans has proven useful,” Campa said. “Germany had bad banks, while countries like Ireland used asset-management agencies in the same way. It could be used again.”

Germany, where unemployment is low and borrowers are less likely to default, has vehemently opposed any pan-European move, arguing that it would leave Germany on the hook for the problems of lenders in countries with mounting unpaid debts.

“Banks are resilient and stronger than before the last crisis,” said Campa. “But we don’t know how the crisis will evolve. It is best to act sooner rather than later.”

Article Source: Click Here

Banks predict biggest ever fall in demand for loans due to Covid-19

Irish banks expect the “biggest ever decrease” in the demand for mortgages and consumer loans as a result of the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic. 

That is one of the results from analysis of the quarterly Bank Lending Survey published by the Central Bank today. 

The Central Bank said the fall in demand will be greater than during the financial crisis a decade ago.  

Banks expect there will be a slight increase in demand for credit overall coming from firms, but more firms are expected to look for short-term credit and fewer of them will borrow for long-term investment.  

The survey was conducted from March 19 to April 3 and is carried out across the euro zone.  

Irish banks reported that the demand for credit was stable in the first three months of the year but that changes over the next three months will be substantial and dramatic. 

It is expected that credit standards for households will become more stringent and “close to levels observed at the height of the financial crisis,” the Central Bank stated. 

The reason for this is a change in banks’ perception of risk due to the general economic situation and borrowers’ creditworthiness. 

But the survey noted that banks are in a better situation than they were during the financial crisis. 

It also noted that banks believe recent actions by the European Central Bank will help with the availability of credit and its cost. It will also “support their profitability,” the Central Bank added. 

Article Source: Click Here

S&P revises outlook for Irish banks downwards

Ratings agency S&P Global Ratings has revised down its outlook for three of the main Irish banks from stable to negative, saying that downside risks for the banks’ financial profiles remain substantial.

However, the agency has affirmed the current ratings of AIB, Bank of Ireland, Permanent TSB and KBC Bank Ireland.

It has also not changed the outlook for KBC because it thinks its parent group will be willing and able to provide both ongoing and extraordinary support over the next 18-24 months.

The agency said European economies, including ours, face an unprecedented economic challenge due to the global slowdown in activity and trade, despite efforts by governments to contain the coronavirus pandemic.

“We continue to expect Ireland’s wide-ranging fiscal and related monetary measures to substantially mitigate this extraordinarily sharp, cyclical shock to the economy, and so also support the banking system in its key role as a conduit of fiscal and monetary support,” the S&P said.

But it added that even under its base case of an economic recovery starting in the third-quarter of this year, its expectation is that the banks’ earnings, asset quality, and in some cases, capitalisation will weaken meaningfully during the remainder of this year and into next.

“We could take further negative rating actions if we expect the cyclical economic recovery to be substantially weaker or delayed, as this would imply a far more negative effect on banks’ credit strengths,” it said in a statement this evening.

“Actions could also follow idiosyncratic negative developments at individual banks.”

The actions following a review by S&P of banking systems in Western Europe following the start of the coronavirus crisis.

“The Irish economy is small and open, making it vulnerable to economic cycles and external shocks, like the ones caused by the COVID-19 pandemic,” it said.

“We expect the Irish economy to contract in 2020 and recover only gradually starting from 2021. However, despite the anticipated recovery, we believe that there will be significant pressure on Irish banks’ operating environment and earnings prospects over the next two-to-three years.”

It says profitability is under increasing pressure at Irish banks because of their ongoing high cost base, compressed interest margins and their investments in transforming their business and becoming more digitally capable.

S&P sees growth opportunities as modest and says competition is stiff.

“The rating actions we have taken reflect that we now see Irish banks’ profitability remaining structurally low for at least the next two years with return on equity in the low single digits,” it says.

It says that even under its economic assumption, the policy responses taken in Ireland may not be completely successful in avoiding permanent economic damage later.

Earlier this month, ratings agency Fitch downgraded its outlook on AIB and Bank of Ireland to negative from stable as a result of the challenges posed by the Covid-19 pandemic.

Article Source: Click Here

EU tells banks to be flexible over loan losses rule during epidemic

European banks have the flexibility to avoid a huge rise in provisioning for non-payment of loans during the coronavirus outbreak, the European Union’s securities and banking watchdogs said today. 

Banks have warned they face mounting provisions as businesses and households they lent money to struggle to repay loans during the outbreak. 

EU states have approved measures to offer some relief to businesses such as repayment holidays on loans. 

But lenders have been unsure whether a payment holiday would technically constitute a failure to pay and therefore trigger increased provisioning as required under a global accounting rule known as IFRS 9. 

Higher provisioning would eat into a bank’s capital. 

“In ESMA’s view, the principles-based nature of IFRS 9 includes sufficient flexibility to faithfully reflect the specific circumstances of the Covid-19 outbreak and the associated public policy measures,” the European Securities and Markets Authority said in a statement. 

ESMA’s banking counterpart, the European Banking Authority (EBA) also sought to reassure lenders today. 

“The EBA calls for flexibility and pragmatism in the application of the prudential framework and clarifies that, in case of debt moratoria, there is no automatic classification in default, forborne, or IFRS9 status,” EBA said in a separate statement.

Article Source: Click Here

Banks urge EU to ease capital rules to fight coronavirus fallout

Europe’s banks have called on European Union authorities to ease capital rules and other regulatory barriers to helping businesses struggling because of the coronavirus epidemic. 

The European Banking Federation (EBF) comprises national banking industry bodies from across Europe.

It has set out a three-stage plan in a letter to the European Union, European Central Bank and the European Banking Authority. 

It asks regulators “for assistance to be able to work constructively with borrowers… which will require flexibility to stem the regulatory-enforced barriers to finance borrowers in temporary struggle.” 

The industry body proposed a set of “immediate decisions” to avoid the flow of cash or liquidity to businesses and households drying up in coming weeks. 

These could be followed by a set of medium-term actions and other measures to “smooth” prudential or capital rule effects on lenders in the next year, the letter said. 

The ECB is due to meet today and faces pressure to take action to ease the impact of coronavirus on the economy after founding EU member Italy went into lockdown due to the epidemic. 

The Bank of England and the Federal Reserve have both made emergency interest rate cuts. 

EU authorities should enable a “moratorium tool” to help keep cash flowing to sound borrowers facing temporary challenges due to coronavirus, the EBF said. 

Regulators in the bloc could also improve the ability of banks to lend by easing the so-called counter cyclical buffer which is built up in good times for use during market shocks or downturns.

The Bank of England cut this buffer to 0% yesterday. 

The EBF said that other types of buffers imposed by national regulators on top of EU minimum requirements could also be eased. 

Regulators should also allow banks to divert the excess liquidity they hold above minimum requirements to non-financial businesses on a temporary basis, the EBF said. 

The ECB should also extend its long term funding to banks, known as the Targeted Longer-Term Refinancing Operations or TLTRO programmes, in time and scope, it added. 

“In the meantime, the EBF is working on a wider set of measures in more detail for the next months which we look forward to sending to you soon,” the letter said.

Article Source: Click here

New rules to require banks to open up their systems

New rules to require banks to open up their systems

Your bank account is set to get more secure – and more open – once new European regulations come into force in September.

The second Payments Services Directive aims to reduce fraud around online transactions. This will likely see consumers having to take more steps to verify their identity online.

But the rules will also require banks to open up their systems, so that other finance and technology firms can offer services to customers.

“Opening banking is a safe and secure technology that will allow customers and small businesses to get more value out of their banking data and their banking payments,” said Imran Gulamhuseinwala, head of the UK’s Open Banking Implementation Entity.

“Banks have historically made it really quite hard for consumers and small businesses to access their data, and also to make payments from their bank accounts,” Mr Gulamhuseinwala said.

“What this regulation really recognises is that there is tremendous value in people’s banking data – and crucially that that data belongs to them and not to their financial institution,” he added.

In practice this means that, by mid-September, Europe banks will need to offer a route through which other companies can offer their services.

This could mean, for example, that a user will be able to use an app to get an overview of multiple accounts.

It could also allow budgeting software to pull in information directly from a user’s accounts, rather than having to rely on that being done manually.

In reality, though, open banking is about creating a framework for new types of services – which means its actual benefits may not become apparent for some time.

“It’s a seismic change for the banking industry but it will take time for consumers to really realise the benefits of it,” Mr Gulamhuseinwala said.

“The reason for that is that open banking is an enabling technology that allows other new entrants into the sector – they’re often known as FinTechs – to build really exciting new propositions and products for customers.”

However some banks may be struggling to get to grips with the change – and that September deadline may prove difficult. For others, however, the shift should come a little easier.

Whether banks are actually keen on the new rules is another matter, however. “Part of the reason that the regulators are pushing on opening banking is precisely because they want to bring additional competition to the market, and of course additional competition doesn’t always serve incumbents well,” he said.

“The kinds of products we’re really expecting customers to benefit from, on one level, are enabling them to get better rates on mortgages, credit cards, overdrafts, better rates on savings… but of course that is something of an economic threat to the incumbent banks.”

But Mr Gulamhuseinwala is confident that it will improve competition, opening the door to new firms while also forcing traditional players to improve their offering.

A lack of competition is often cited as a major problem within the Irish consumer finance sector – as is the matter of culture within banks.

That is something that the industry is hoping to address through the Irish Banking Culture Board.

Headed by retired Court of Appeal judge, Mr Justice John Hedigan, the board is industry-funded but independently operated. It also has no regulatory powers, which is a different approach to the one taken by the UK.

“I think it’s really interesting, the initiative that is happening in the Irish market, and I’m very supportive of it,” said Mr Gulamhuseinwala.

“In the UK… we’ve separated out regulation. Conduct regulation sits with the FCA and then prudential regulation, which sits with the Bank of England.

“That separation really does allow the regulators to look very differently at those two elements. Sometimes they can actually be in conflict and I think it’s very important that the culture in the industry recognises some of the inherent conflicts,” he added.

Article Source: Click Here

Fee increases will be critical for Irish banks – S&P

Fee increases will be critical for Irish banks – S&P

Increasing fees and commissions will be critical for Irish banks in the coming years, in order to offset pressure on the difference between the amount of interest they earn versus what they pay out to those lending them money.

That’s according to ratings agency S&P Global Ratings, which says it does not expect banks here to be able to expand their net interest margins further, given competitive movement in the markets, low interest rates, and gradual build up in banks’ stock capital buffers.

In a research note on the Irish banking system, the agency says the concentration in real estate and extent of existing tracker mortgages means the quality of the sector’s loan book is typically weaker than in many other EU states.

It says the use of money set aside for losses has in the past helped to support losses, but this benefit is not likely to continue.

It also cautions that it does not expect a material improvement in earnings this year, because of limited revenue diversification and high cost bases

S&P says capitalization remains at levels that are relatively strong.

However, the agency says capital is set to decline a little as loan books expand and dividend distribution policies remain the same..

Overall though Irish banks have demonstrated stability, the organisation claims, despite internal and external challenges.

Their credit profiles have improved materially in recent years, it says, as a result of better economic conditions, placing them in a stronger position to absorb future shocks, like Brexit.

Non-performing loans will continue to fall this year, it predicts, and near-term profitability to remain stable.

As a result, it says short term upgrades to Irish banks are most likely to be based on their improved additional loss-absorbing capacity, it says.

It claims Bank of Ireland has demonstrated a superior track record around the quality of its assets compared with other peers in the market here.

As a result, it says, the positive outlook for the bank suggests it may change the rating on Bank of Ireland to bring it in line with the higher ratings on its international peers.

On Ulster Bank, it says, the positive outlook reflects that of its parent company, the Royal Bank of Scotland.

Article Source: Click Here